Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 8/31/1994

State v. Gill

Citations

  • 70 Ohio St. 3d 150

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that defendant in each case violated statute prohibiting operation of motor vehicle while under influence of alcohol when he “was intoxicated and in the driver’s seat of his vehicle with the key in the ignition,” regardless of whether motor was running
  • “[a] clear purpose of the [Ohio OUI statute] is to discourage persons from putting themselves in the position in which they can potentially cause the movement of a motor vehicle while intoxicated . . .”
  • superseded by statute on other grounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Douglas, Fifth, Moyer, Pfeifer, Reader, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.