State v. Giles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• order of contempt, whether civil or criminal, must be based upon written findings of fact and conclusions of law, signed by the court
• magistrate has “prerogative to believe whom he chose and to decide which witness was telling the truth and which was falsifying”
• magistrate has \prerogative to believe whom he chose and to decide which witness was telling the truth and which was falsifying\
• it was magistrate’s “prerogative to believe whom he chose and to decide which witness was telling the truth and which one was falsifying”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hurst
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1991-11-26· cited 25×
• State v. Knill
  Utah Supreme Court· 1982-12-22· cited 22×
• State v. Jaeger
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1995-05-18· cited 15×
• State v. Wodskow
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1995-05-18· cited 6×
• Davis v. Hallett
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1981-06-26· cited 5×