Skip to main content

State v. Giles

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 5465

Syllabus

Felony sentencing; R.C. 2953.08(G)(2). The trial court's imposition of maximum, consecutive sentences is not contrary to law because the trial court did not improperly consider \other acts\ evidence—namely, letters from alleged former victims about uncharged conduct and the facts of the dismissed rape charges—when imposing the defendant-appellant's sentence.

Judges: Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.