State v. Gilcrease
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 487
Syllabus
Motion for mistrial Fifth Amendment right to remain silent abuse of discretion bench trial fair trial sufficiency of the evidence circumstantial evidence discharging a firearm into a habitation R.C. 2923.161(A)(1) discharging a firearm upon or over a public roadway R.C. 2923.162(A)(3) manifest weight of the evidence self-defense force consecutive sentences R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) supported by the record R.C. 2953.08(G)(2). The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant's motion for a mistrial in this bench trial where the witness's allegedly improper reference to the defendant's assertion of his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent did not affect the trial court's decision-making and the defendant had not demonstrated the witness's statement deprived him of a fair trial. The state presented sufficient evidence from which a reasonable factfinder could infer that the defendant was the shooter at the victims' residences where the evidence showed that the defendant was in possession of a .40 caliber firearm at two of the four crime scenes, all of the .40 caliber casings recovered from each of the four crime scenes were fired from the same .40 caliber firearm, and two of the crime scenes involved the same victim. The defendant's convictions for discharging a firearm into a habitation and discharging a firearm upon or over a public roadway in the May 14 incident are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The defendant's conviction for discharging a firearm upon or over a public roadway in the June 26 incident is not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The factfinder could reasonably believe that the defendant was justified in firing his weapon against an initial attack but he did not act in self-defense where he continued to shoot at the attacker after the initial threat was gone. Defendant's consecutive sentence was supported by the record. However, because there is no evidence in the record that the trial court imposed a sentence i
Judges: Sheehan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. LottOhio Supreme Court· 1990-06-06· cited 1,930×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 1,503×
- Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court· 1973-02-27· cited 1,368×
- State v. FranklinOhio Supreme Court· 1991-11-20· cited 798×
- State v. WillifordOhio Supreme Court· 1990-03-14· cited 541×
- State v. RobbinsOhio Supreme Court· 1979-05-02· cited 484×
- Harris v. RiveraSupreme Court· 1981-12-14· cited 429×
- Michalic v. Cleveland Tankers, Inc.Supreme Court· 1960-11-07· cited 323×
- State v. VenesOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-09· cited 321×
- State v. DurrOhio Supreme Court· 1991-03-20· cited 267×
- State v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court· 1986-03-19· cited 244×
- State v. IaconaOhio Supreme Court· 2001-08-29· cited 220×
- State v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court· 1989-08-09· cited 190×
- State v. LeachOhio Supreme Court· 2004-05-12· cited 147×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.