Skip to main content

State v. Gilbert

Citations

  • 751 S.W.2d 454
  • 1988 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 220

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “field sobriety tests are not „scientific tests‟; and the admissibility of the results is not to be governed by rules pertaining to the admission of scientific evidence.”
  • holding that “field sobriety tests are not ‘scientific tests;, and the admissibility of the results is not to be governed by rules pertaining to the admission of scientific evidence”
  • holding that “[w]hen the defendant elected to testify in support of his defense, and took the witness stand, he waived his constitutional rights, federal and state, against self incrimination”
  • determining that when officer was in pursuit of defendant’s vehicle within his jurisdiction, he was -6- authorized to stop the defendant after his vehicle crossed into the next county
  • waiver by failing to stand on motion for judgment of acquittal and by failing to make references to the record
  • state not required to prove blood sample drawn in compliance with § 55-10-406(a)(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Duncan, Daughtrey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.