Skip to main content

State v. Giddings

Citations

  • 352 P.2d 1003
  • 67 N.M. 87

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • knowledge that a substance possessed by defendant is a controlled substance may be proved by circumstantial evidence
  • possession of marijuana; defendant must have “knowledge of the presence and narcotic [sic] character of the object possessed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chavez, McGhee, Compton, Carmody, Moise

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.