Skip to main content

State v. Gibson

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 3614

Syllabus

Appellant's convictions for rape were not supported by insufficient evidence or against the manifest weight of the evidence. The jury did not lose its way by believing the testimony of the victim over that of appellant. The trial court did not err by excluding testimony about an alleged prior inconsistent statement of the victim the statement regarded only a collateral matter. Appellant's sentence was lawful, and the record does not clearly and convincingly fail to support the trial court's consecutive-sentence findings. Judgment affirmed.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Copy at State Court Record ECF No. 9, Ex. 18

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.