Skip to main content

State v. Gibbs

Citations

  • 730 N.E.2d 1027
  • 134 Ohio App. 3d 247

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the content of the [communication] is immaterial to whether [it] constitutes harassment or not.”
  • finding R.C. 2917.21(A)(5) is not unconstitutionally over broad, even though statute restricts person's ability to make a telephone call
  • upholding trial court’s mid-deliberations correction of verdict form that mistakenly reflected wrong criminal charge, where court reconvened jurors to read supplemental instructions curing mistake

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Valen, Young, Walsh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.