State v. Gibbons
Citations
- 118 Wash. 171
- 203 P. 390
- 1922 Wash. LEXIS 645
Syllabus
<p>Intoxicating Liquobs (6) — Pbohibition—Unlawful Possession Statutes — Eighteenth Amendment. Initiative measure No. 3, as amended by Laws 1917, p. 60, § 11, providing that it shall be unlawful for any person to have in his possession any intoxicating liquor is not nugatory as in conflict with the Federal statute (41 Stat. L., p. 317, § 33) declaring “it shall not be unlawful to possess liquors in one’s private dwelling”; inasmuch as the state statute covers the offense of possession away from one’s dwelling, and is not superseded by the national law except in so far as it is in conflict therewith.</p> <p>Statutes (33-36) — Amendment—Time fob — “Enactment” of Statute — Construction. The initiative and referendum provision of the constitution (Const., Amendt. 7) prohibiting the amendment of a law approved by a majority of the electors voting thereon “within a period of two years following such enactment,” contemplates the time of its complete enactment in a legal sense; accordingly, a provision of the act itself postponing the time of its taking effect to a later date would not defeat the power of the legislature to amend the act at any time after the expiration of two years from its proclamation by the governor.</p> <p>Criminal Law (57) — Complaint—Abandonment — New Complaint Charging Higher Offense — Rights of Accused — Jurisdiction. The abandonment of a prosecution instituted by a prosecuting attorney in a justice court does not militate against his power to file a new complaint charging a higher offense to be tried by the justice as a committing magistrate and thereafter proceed upon proper information filed in the superior court to a trial of the accused for a higher offense of which the latter court alone has jurisdiction.</p> <p>Intoxicating Liquors (30, 49) — Unlawful Possession — Prior Convictions — Evidence—Admissibility. Laws 1917, p. 61, § 15, amending initiative measure No. 3, increasing the punishment for a second violation of the liquor prohibition la
Judges: Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-06-27· cited 2,501×
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court· 1949-06-27· cited 1,554×
- State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court· 1999-07-01· cited 415×
- State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court· 1982-02-18· cited 340×
- State v. KennedyWashington Supreme Court· 1986-10-16· cited 339×
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court· 1986-07-01· cited 168×
- State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court· 2001-02-02· cited 164×
- State v. BondsWashington Supreme Court· 1982-11-10· cited 163×
- State v. RingerWashington Supreme Court· 1983-12-29· cited 163×
- State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court· 1999-11-04· cited 157×
- City of Seattle v. MesianiWashington Supreme Court· 1988-05-12· cited 144×
- State v. ValdezWashington Supreme Court· 2009-12-24· cited 139×
- State v. MichaelsWashington Supreme Court· 1962-09-28· cited 138×
- State v. LangIdaho Supreme Court· 1983-11-21· cited 133×
- State v. AfanaWashington Supreme Court· 2010-07-01· cited 126×
- State v. PattersonWashington Supreme Court· 1973-11-01· cited 118×
- State v. PattonWashington Supreme Court· 2009-10-22· cited 111×
- State v. ArreolaWashington Supreme Court· 2012-12-20· cited 104×
- State v. HughlettWashington Supreme Court· 1923-04-19· cited 98×
- State v. TonnSupreme Court of Iowa· 1923-01-16· cited 98×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1886-02-01· cited 3,820×
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1920-03-01· cited 2,373×
- McKnight V. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1902-05-06· cited 80×
- State v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court· 1915-01-11· cited 60×
- State v. TurnerWashington Supreme Court· 1921-03-29· cited 30×
- State v. WoodsWashington Supreme Court· 1921-06-21· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.