State v. Gerhardt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that statutes governing restitution permit crime victim to recover “reasonable expenses necessarily incurred * * * to redress the harm caused to the victim by a defendant’s criminal conduct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Gerhardt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-11-25· cited 17×
• State v. Christy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-14· cited 2×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Pumphrey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-11-05· cited 32×
• State v. Jordan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-03-28· cited 22×
• State v. Doty
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-11-10· cited 20×
• State v. Stephens
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-08-28· cited 19×
• State v. Ramos
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-11-26· cited 15×
• State v. Bullock
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-06-28· cited 7×
• State v. Mahoney
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-10-14· cited 5×
• State v. Mahoney
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-02-03· cited 3×
• State v. Porter
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-06-03· cited 2×