Supreme Court of Louisiana· 11/30/1993
State v. Gerard
Citations
- 627 So. 2d 174
- 1993 La. LEXIS 3389
- 1993 WL 495667
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Even when they are not essential elements of an offense, time and date may become of the essence when the defendant presents an alibi defense to the offense charged, or is in some other way prejudiced by the date set forth in the indictment”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Calogero
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- State v. PrieurSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1973-03-29· cited 910×
- United States v. Murad NersesianSecond Circuit· 1987-06-29· cited 559×
- Flakes v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1987-11-16· cited 122×
- United States v. Thomas ReedEleventh Circuit· 1989-11-08· cited 95×
- State v. McDanielSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1982-02-19· cited 37×
- State v. ChittimSupreme Court of Missouri· 1953-10-12· cited 27×
- Commonwealth v. BoyerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-03-19· cited 21×
- United States v. James Edward CreamerEleventh Circuit· 1983-12-12· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. PelusoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-04-22· cited 18×
- State v. GerardSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1993-09-24· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.