State v. George

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that generally in cases of theft by deception, something falsely described is given in exchange to induce the 5 It is notable that during trial, Friedrich unequivocally stated that Cuzzetto had not stolen from him. 15 No. 59682-2-II transaction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Washington v. Gary Bruce Farnworth
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2017-06-01· cited 4×
• State v. Erickson
  Washington Supreme Court· 2010-01-21· cited 3×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. J.P.
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-05-22· cited 558×
• State v. Ose
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-12-15· cited 70×
• People v. Brady
  California Court of Appeal· 1969-08-29· cited 49×
• State v. Lee
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-11-09· cited 48×
• State v. Mills
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1964-10-22· cited 34×
• State v. Aurgemma
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1976-05-27· cited 32×
• State v. Roche, Inc.
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1994-08-05· cited 26×
• State v. Martinez
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1979-08-21· cited 21×
• State v. Forshee
  Utah Supreme Court· 1978-12-01· cited 14×
• People v. Ross
  California Court of Appeal· 1972-04-26· cited 14×
• State v. Farnsworth
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-01-31· cited 12×
• Lane v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-11-09· cited 11×
• State v. Stephens
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1998-01-23· cited 10×
• State v. George
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2006-05-01· cited 3×