State v. Gentzen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, to exhaust remedies, a prisoner must file 8 appeals in the place, and at the time, the prison’s administrative rules require
• holding that the “negative conse- quences of racial isolation that Lynn seeks to avoid and the benefits of diversity that it hopes to achieve” constituted com- pelling interests
• holding that when racial diversity is the compelling interest — “[t]he only relevant criterion, then, is a student’s race; individualized con- sideration beyond that is irrelevant to the compelling inter- est”
• holding that a “transfer policy conditioned on district demographics (+/- 10- 15%)” was not a quota because it “reflects the defendants’ efforts to obtain the benefits of diversity in a stable learning environment”
• contending that a school district’s noncompetitive transfer plan violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
• noting that the circumstances where this doctrine can be 27 properly applied are “exceedingly rare”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).