State v. Gella

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a creditor may collaterally attack a divorce decree as fraudulent under the UFTA
• declining to address an issue because none of the parties raised such issue on appeal
• declining to address an issue because none of the parties raised such issue on appeal
• \It is well-settled that an appellate court will not pass upon issues dependent upon the credibility of witnesses and the weight of the evidence; this is the province of the trial judge.\
• in holding that Gella’s statement to a detective was voluntary, finding it significant that “Gella was no neophyte to the criminal justice system ... and, thereby, had more than passing familiarity with police procedure” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).