Skip to main content
· 6/30/1999

State v. Gehm

Citations

  • 1999 SD 82
  • 600 N.W.2d 535

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “it is not enough to ask if the verdict would possibly be different. The question is would it probably be different.”
  • referring to the state standard governing a motion for a new trial — which is materially identical to the Salinas standard — as a “heavy burden”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Konenkamp, Miller, Sabers, Amundson, Gilbertson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.