· 6/30/1999
State v. Gehm
Citations
- 1999 SD 82
- 600 N.W.2d 535
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “it is not enough to ask if the verdict would possibly be different. The question is would it probably be different.”
- referring to the state standard governing a motion for a new trial — which is materially identical to the Salinas standard — as a “heavy burden”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Konenkamp, Miller, Sabers, Amundson, Gilbertson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.