Supreme Court of South Carolina· 6/27/1895
State v. Gaymon
Citations
- 44 S.C. 333
- 22 S.E. 305
- 1895 S.C. LEXIS 76
Syllabus
<p>1. Personal Knowledge op Juror. — On a trial for perjury, the trial judge committed no error in charging the jury that they must not allow their personal knowledge of defendant’s mental condition to enter into their judgment in arriving^at their verdict — such condition being a material fact in issue.</p> <p>2. Case Criticised. — This case distinguished from McKain v. Love, 2 Hill, 506.</p>
Judges: Gaey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.