· 7/11/2018
State v. Gatherer
Citations
- 421 P.3d 452
- 190 Wash. 2d 1027
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that there is no authority supporting plaintiff s proposition that filing a complaint alone constitutes the making ofa contract with the United States
- finding no authority supporting plaintiff’s proposition that filing a complaint gives rise to a contract with the United States
- \The Court of Federal Claims has no authority because ... qui tam suits may only be heard in the district courts.\
- “Plaintiff offers no authority for the proposition that the filing of a complaint by a plaintiff, and the acceptance of that filing by a clerk of court, could constitute the making of a contract with the United States.”
- “Plaintiff offers no authority for the proposition that the filing of a complaint by a plaintiff, and the acceptance of that filing by a clerk of court, could constitute the making of a contract with the United States.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fairhurst
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.