Skip to main content
· 7/11/2018

State v. Gatherer

Citations

  • 421 P.3d 452
  • 190 Wash. 2d 1027

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that there is no authority supporting plaintiff s proposition that filing a complaint alone constitutes the making ofa contract with the United States
  • finding no authority supporting plaintiff’s proposition that filing a complaint gives rise to a contract with the United States
  • \The Court of Federal Claims has no authority because ... qui tam suits may only be heard in the district courts.\
  • “Plaintiff offers no authority for the proposition that the filing of a complaint by a plaintiff, and the acceptance of that filing by a clerk of court, could constitute the making of a contract with the United States.”
  • “Plaintiff offers no authority for the proposition that the filing of a complaint by a plaintiff, and the acceptance of that filing by a clerk of court, could constitute the making of a contract with the United States.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fairhurst

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.