Skip to main content

State v. Gatewood

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 2513

Syllabus

The trial court failed to orally advise appellant of the R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(c) notifications required by the Reagan Tokes Act. But the trial court's comment at the sentencing hearing that the court did not \care\ about appellant's minimal criminal history did not make the sentence contrary to law by indicating the trial court's failure to consider the \not likely to commit future crimes\ sentencing factors set forth in R.C. 2929.12(E). Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for a new sentencing hearing. (Donovan, J., dissenting.)

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.