State v. Gaspare

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that \the need to have a well-known brand with wide consumer acceptance\ amounted to a barrier to entering the market for rotary electric shavers
• reversing district court’s directed verdict and ordering new trial on § 2 claims due to evidence that company had 90% of rotary 18 electric shaver market, existence of substantial entry barriers, and company had drastically reduced prices to eliminate potential competitors
• “The jury was not required to accept his expert testimony, even if it was uncontradicted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).