Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 11/27/1990
State v. Gaspar
Citations
- 801 P.2d 30
- 8 Haw. App. 317
- 1990 Haw. App. LEXIS 52
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting defendant’s argument that he did not testify because his testimony would have implicated his co-defendant, who would have retaliated by testifying and incriminating defendant
- rejecting defendant’s argument that he did not testify because his testimony would have implicated his co-defendant, who would have retaliated by testifying and incriminating defendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burns, Heen, Tanaka
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CordeiroHawaii Supreme Court· 2002-10-07· cited 94×
- State v. RenonHawaii Supreme Court· 1992-03-18· cited 42×
- People v. HanzCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1961-04-04· cited 19×
- State v. TimasHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1996-10-04· cited 15×
- State v. Walton.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2014-02-14· cited 15×
- State v. AHQUINHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2008-04-11
- State v. LauvaoHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2022-09-09
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.