Skip to main content

State v. Gaspar

Citations

  • 801 P.2d 30
  • 8 Haw. App. 317
  • 1990 Haw. App. LEXIS 52

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting defendant’s argument that he did not testify because his testimony would have implicated his co-defendant, who would have retaliated by testifying and incriminating defendant
  • rejecting defendant’s argument that he did not testify because his testimony would have implicated his co-defendant, who would have retaliated by testifying and incriminating defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, Heen, Tanaka

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.