State v. Gaskins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the differing effects of a pretrial dismissal following a mistrial and a midtrial dismissal that may occur during the second trial
• \A Nolle prosequi is a formal entry on the record by the prosecuting officer by which he declares he will not prosecute the case further.\
• \A [n]olle prosequi is a formal entry on the record by the prosecuting officer by which he declares he will not prosecute the case further.\
• “In this State we follow the rule that the acts of a court of record are known by its records alone and cannot be established by parol testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Patrick
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-05-01· cited 19×
• MacK v. Riley
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-06-04· cited 11×
• State v. Scott
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-09-22· cited 10×
• State v. Mills
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-03-22· cited 10×
• Mackey v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-03-22· cited 7×
• Livingston v. Murdaugh
  Fourth Circuit· 1999-08-16· cited 4×
• Allman v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1984-03-01· cited 3×
• Spartanburg Buddhist Center v. Ork
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-07-13· cited 3×
• Brown v. Green
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-01-11· cited 2×
• Livingston v. Murdaugh
  Fourth Circuit· 1999-08-30· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Long v. McMILLAN
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1955-03-15· cited 19×