State v. Garvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• definitions of \threat\ do not create alternative means of committing crime of second degree extortion, but merely defined an element of the crime
• definitions of “threat” do not create alternative means of committing crime of second degree extortion, but merely defined an element of the crime
• the definitions of “threat,” for purposes of the extortion statute, do not create alternative elements to the crime but merely define an element of the crime
• by defining \threat” as that word is used in the extortion statute \the legislature was not creating alternative elements to, but merely defining an element of, the crime”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Smith
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-03-15· cited 151×
• State v. Linehan
  Washington Supreme Court· 2002-10-24· cited 71×
• State Of Washington v. Katrina R. Loos
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2020-10-05· cited 51×
• State v. Lindsey
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-10-15· cited 47×
• State v. Strohm
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-08-08· cited 42×
• State v. Laico
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-11-01· cited 36×
• State v. Marko
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-07-13· cited 27×
• State v. Martinez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-10-17· cited 14×
• State v. Arseneau
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-09-12· cited 5×
• Summers v. Feather
  D. Oregon· 2015-08-05· cited 1×
• State Of Washington, V Gary Lee Lindsey, Jr.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-10-15