Court of Appeals of Kansas· 12/1/1978
State v. Garton
Citations
- 586 P.2d 1386
- 2 Kan. App. 2d 709
- 1978 Kan. App. LEXIS 223
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- proceeding was commenced “forthwith,” despite thirteen month delay, where defendant was incarcerated and was therefore not prejudiced by delay and action was instituted immediately upon his release
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spencer, Abbott, Meyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Foster v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-03-24· cited 77×
- Bouldin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1987-04-21· cited 23×
- State v. HicksNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-12-18· cited 20×
- State v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1988-07-22· cited 8×
- Potter v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1990-03-27· cited 4×
- State v. WaldenCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1990-12-28· cited 2×
- Opinion No. Oag 31-89, (1989)Wisconsin Attorney General Reports· 1989-10-11· cited 1×
- Attorney General Opinion No.Kansas Attorney General Reports· 1994-05-27
- Citizens Bank v. GaskinsCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2025-03-21
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.