State v. Garrett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing the standard for determining whether a trial court’s instruction of a dead- locked jury was so “coercive” as to violate the “defendant’s constitutional rights to a fair trial and due process”
• no coercion where the jury deliberated an hour and a half after receiving a supplemental instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Sell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-09-13· cited 15×
• State v. Lewis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-10-30· cited 2×
• State v. Wayman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-03-19· cited 2×
• State v. Brandon Rolls
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2020-02-28· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Smith
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-05-10· cited 205×
• State v. Marsh
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1971-11-05· cited 61×
• Schlimgen v. MAY TRUCKING COMPANY
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-01-24· cited 7×
• State v. Claridy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-05-16· cited 6×
• State v. Arreola
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-20· cited 6×
• State v. Hutchison
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-07-03· cited 5×
• Schlimgen v. May Trucking Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-12-19· cited 3×