Skip to main content

State v. Garner

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 5116

Syllabus

Appellant's sentence not contrary to law where trial court, orally at the revocation hearing and in writing in its sentencing entry, expressly indicated its consideration of the principles and purposes of sentencing under R.C. 2929.11 and the seriousness and recidivism factors under R.C. 2929.12, and made the necessary findings to support consecutive sentences under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4).

Judges: Zmuda

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.