State v. Gardner
Citations
- 193 N.E.3d 1156
- 2022 Ohio 2725
Syllabus
Appellate review of a sentence is not a \constitutional right\ because the right of such review is strictly conferred by statute. Despite appellant's arguments, R.C. 2953.08(D)(3) is constitutional and does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment. Furthermore, appellant's inability to challenge his sentence under R.C. 2953.08(D)(3) is not a punishment, but rather the criminal procedure involving felony sentencing appeals.
Judges: Piper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Patrick (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-22· cited 85×
- State v. CampbellOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-03· cited 14×
- State v. GreviousOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-20· cited 9×
- State v. ThomasOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-28· cited 8×
- State v. JenkinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-11-19· cited 3×
- State v. ThomasOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-13· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.