State v. Gardner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the erroneous introduction of prior misconduct evidence involves a claim arising under state law and does not involve any constitutional right” [internal quotation marks omitted]
• erroneous intro- duction of prior misconduct evidence involves claim arising under state law and does not involve constitu- tional right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. FERDINAND R.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-12-20· cited 4×
• State v. Robert B.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2020-10-06· cited 2×