State v. Garcia
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 707
Syllabus
R.C. 2929.11 R.C. 2929.12 sentence contrary to law Reagan Tokes Act. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by imposing a prison sentence contrary to R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12, and the purposes and principles of the felony sentencing guidelines. Appellant's claim that the Reagan Tokes Act is unconstitutional is forfeited on appeal because she did not raise the issue in the trial court.
Judges: Laster Mays
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 3,571×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court· 1986-02-19· cited 1,385×
- State v. Quarterman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-09-23· cited 582×
- State v. A.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-06-20· cited 114×
- State v. CollierOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-06-09· cited 87×
- State v. Buttery (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-21· cited 53×
- State v. ConantOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-27· cited 39×
- State v. DamesOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-22· cited 29×
- State v. AlexanderOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-27· cited 28×
- State v. GonzalezOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-11-19· cited 24×
- State v. PaulinoOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-01-05· cited 22×
- State v. PavlinaOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-08-22· cited 16×
- State v. LenardOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-23· cited 12×
- State v. PonyardOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-29· cited 8×
- State v. YoungOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-20· cited 8×
- Broadview Hts. v. MisencikOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-04-10· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.