State v. Garcia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• consider scientific literature outside record as part of de novo review
• consider scientific literature outside record as part of de novo review
• also noting National Research Council (NRC) found “LRs should be admissible unless they are so unintelligible that they provide no assistance to a jury or so misleading that they are unduly prejudicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hernandez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-06-04· cited 179×
• Lohmeier v. Hammer
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-12-12· cited 47×
• State v. Ayers
  Montana Supreme Court· 2003-04-28· cited 45×
• State v. Belton
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2004-04-19· cited 17×
• State of Arizona v. Ronald Bruce Bigger
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-05-24

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
• Frye v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
• State v. Bible
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 658×
• United States v. Herman Franks, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Max Britton, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Boyce Mitchell
  Sixth Circuit· 1975-06-23· cited 185×
• United States v. Porter
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-12-22· cited 78×
• People v. Dalcollo
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-08-19· cited 37×
• State v. Johnson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1996-07-16· cited 27×
• State v. Jones
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-09-19· cited 26×
• State v. Hummert
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1997-03-11· cited 23×
• State v. Bogan
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-11-21· cited 17×
• United States v. Yee
  N.D. Ohio· 1990-02-14· cited 6×