Skip to main content

State v. Garcia

Citations

  • 7 A.3d 355
  • 299 Conn. 39
  • 2010 Conn. LEXIS 411

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “the ultimate determination of . . . whether [a] translation was accurate rested with the jury”
  • stating that the issue of whether a fact witness’s “translation was accurate” was one that “[d]efense counsel was free to . . . explore . . . on cross-examination”
  • [b]ecause it is the trial court’s function to weigh the evidence and [to] determine credibility, we give great deference to its findings’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • the defendant was free to cross-examine officer's translation of the defendant's confession on issues of competence, methodology, and potential bias; the ultimate determination of the accuracy of the translation rested with the jury
  • direct testimony and circumstantial evidence among ways to authenticate writing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Norcott, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille, Zarella, McLachlan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.