Skip to main content

State v. Garcia

Citations

  • 931 P.2d 427
  • 187 Ariz. 527
  • 231 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 38
  • 1996 Ariz. App. LEXIS 262

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding application of laches defense did not “detract from the strong public policy of promoting the welfare of children.”
  • holding father would be prejudiced if forced to pay arrear-ages for sixteen years because he had other children to support, other financial obligations, and was never allowed to develop a relationship with his son
  • holding father would be prejudiced if forced to pay arrearages for sixteen years because he had other children to support, other financial obligations, and was never allowed to develop a relationship with his son
  • finding hardship where paternity action not filed for more than sixteen years and father was self-employed as a scrap metal recycler, did not own a home, had a wife and six minor children and no savings or retirement plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Espinosa, Florez, Hathaway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.