Ohio Court of Appeals· 10/21/2022
State v. Garber
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 3770
Syllabus
Defendant's intellectual disability, on its own, did not necessitate a competency hearing. Dialogue with the court during the plea hearing did not demonstrate defendant's incompetency. Trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to request a competency evaluation.
Judges: Osowik
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-04-18· cited 3,197×
- Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court· 1993-06-24· cited 1,916×
- State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-15· cited 402×
- Stanley v. CullenNinth Circuit· 2011-01-31· cited 272×
- Mike Hernandez v. Eddie S. Ylst, WardenNinth Circuit· 1991-04-10· cited 171×
- State v. SandersOhio Supreme Court· 2002-01-30· cited 156×
- State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court· 2002-12-11· cited 96×
- State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court· 2004-03-10· cited 69×
- State v. Lawson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-10-07· cited 58×
- Robert Lee Alexander v. Richard L. DuggerEleventh Circuit· 1988-03-28· cited 48×
- State v. ScottOhio Supreme Court· 2001-05-11· cited 25×
- State v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County· 2017-12-07· cited 15×
- State v. IngramOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-20· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.