Skip to main content
· 8/31/1995

State v. Ganotisi

Citations

  • 902 P.2d 977
  • 79 Haw. 342
  • 1995 Haw. App. LEXIS 37

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Stepdaughter was cross-examined regarding her prior inconsistent statements ..., thus satisfying the foundational requirements for use of her [earlier,] prior consistent statements under HRE Rule[] 613(c)” (citation omitted)
  • “Although an indigent criminal defendant is entitled to be provided with a ‘record of sufficient completeness’ to permit proper consideration of the defendant’s claims on appeal, Mayer v. City of Chicago, [404 U.S. 189, 193–94] (1971

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, Watanabe, Kirimitsu

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.