Skip to main content

State v. Gamble

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 895

Syllabus

The trial court erred in its sentence of the Defendant-Appellant on the merged counts in the indictment. Further, the trial court erred in assessing the Defendant-Appellant with a mandatory fine without a showing of his present or future ability to pay the fine. Further, the trial court did not err by overruling Defendant-Appellant's motions to suppress and dismiss. Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Judges: Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.