Skip to main content

State v. Gamble

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 1527

Syllabus

Judgment affirmed. The jury could reasonably conclude that appellant, with prior calculation and design, made a calculated decision to kill the victim and then followed through on his decision. Appellant's conviction for aggravated murder was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. As such, there was sufficient evidence to support the aggravated murder conviction, and the trial court properly denied appellant's motion for acquittal under Crim.R. 29.

Judges: Horton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.