Skip to main content

State v. Galvan

Citations

  • 297 N.W.2d 344
  • 1980 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 952

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the passage of two days as close enough to the transaction, especially for a child, to qualify as an exited utterance
  • holding the passage of two days “leaves [the evidence] close enough to the transaction so that the trial court could have believed any presumption of fabrication was excluded”
  • holding the passage of two days “leaves [the evidence] close enough to the transaction so that the trial court could have believed any presumption of fabrication was excluded”
  • holding the passage of two days “leaves [the evidence] close enough to the transaction so that the trial court could have believed any presumption of fabrication was excluded”
  • where the Iowa Supreme Court held that defendant’s providing transportation, assisting in cleaning blood stains, and securing clothing was sufficient to support a first-degree murder conviction grounded on the aiding and abetting theory
  • 2 days between time of offense and statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reynoldson, Legrand, Harris, McCormick, Larson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.