State v. Gallegos-Delgado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the court erred in summarily denying a defendant’s 3.850 motion because the record attachments did not conclusively refute the defendant’s assertion that his defense counsel failed to correctly advise him regarding the maximum penalties associated with his charges

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).