New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1/3/1984
State v. Gallagher
Citations
- 675 P.2d 429
- 100 N.M. 697
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a warrantless probation search condition, that is reasonably related to a probationer’s rehabilitation, is a valid limitation to a defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights
- rejecting the defendant’s argument that a choice between a consent-to-search provision and going to prison was not really a choice and thus consent was not voluntary
- rejecting the defendant's argument that a choice between a consent-to-search provision and going to prison was not really a choice and thus consent was not voluntary
- ‘You shall permit your probation officer to visit at your home and place of employment at any time and permit a search of your person, automobile, and residence to ensure compliance of your probation conditions.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walters, Hendley, Donnelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BrusuelasNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-06-04· cited 149×
- State v. BacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-03-01· cited 50×
- State v. Michael G.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-11-17· cited 32×
- State v. MarquartNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-07-30· cited 28×
- People v. HaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1998-05-26· cited 1×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- United States v. Virginia Consuelo-GonzalezNinth Circuit· 1975-04-15· cited 247×
- People v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-09-22· cited 215×
- State v. DonaldsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-05-17· cited 99×
- United States v. Midwest Video Corp.Supreme Court· 1972-03-27· cited 78×
- State v. MontgomeryArizona Supreme Court· 1977-06-17· cited 72×
- State v. PerbixNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-03-03· cited 39×
- State v. GardnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1980-08-21· cited 37×
- State v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-02-07· cited 35×
- People v. RichardsMichigan Court of Appeals· 1977-07-11· cited 26×
- State v. CastilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1980-04-24· cited 24×
- State v. BacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1977-03-22· cited 18×
- Maples v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-04-01· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.