State v. Gale

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \the record before us lacks any factual information that there would have been witnesses who would have been unavailable to the state if the continuance had been granted\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Clardy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-07-19· cited 19×
• State v. Powell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-09-28· cited 14×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-05-06· cited 5×
• People v. Brown
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2011-03-31· cited 4×
• Dept. of Human Services v. C. D. D.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-09-24· cited 2×
• State v. Gale
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-12-29

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ungar v. Sarafite
  Supreme Court· 1964-05-04· cited 1,845×
• State v. Rogers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-05-04· cited 302×
• State v. Wolfer
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1965-06-30· cited 27×
• State v. Pflieger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-11-19· cited 26×
• State v. Hug
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-03-06· cited 19×
• State v. Lingren
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-05-14· cited 13×