State v. Gailey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• exercising discretion to correct plain error in imposing a probation condition “because the trial court did not have a lawful basis on which to impose the condition and it implicat[ed] defendant’s fundamental rights”
• defendant did not preserve argument because his objec- tion “did not suggest that he believed that the trial court lacked authority,” only that the court’s decision “was not necessary”
• defendant did not preserve argument because his objec- tion “did not suggest that he believed that the trial court lacked authority,” only that the court’s decision “was not necessary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Diaz-Briceno
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-02-19

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Thackaberry
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-08-11· cited 28×
• State v. Nelson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-03-24· cited 2×