State v. Gabrillo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the verdict represented the jury’s determination that [t]he defendant’s evidence was not believed, i.e., it did not raise any reasonable doubts of [t]he defendant’s guilt and, on the other hand, that the State’s witnesses were believed”
• stating that “where the criminal defense is not an affirmative defense, the 'defendant need only raise a reasonable doubt as to his guilt’ ”
• stating that “on appeal, this court will not attempt to reconcile conflicting evidence”
• noting that alibi is not an affirmative defense
• noting that alibi is not an affirmative defense
• substantial evidence is “evidence which a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support the conclusion of the factfinder”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).