State v. Funk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• even though the order of probation, imposed after period of retained jurisdiction, stated that defendant could withdraw his plea of guilty and have his case dismissed if he successfully completed probation, the district court did not have the power to grant such relief
• when placing a defendant on probation, the sentencing court did not have the authority to promise that the defendant could withdraw his guilty plea upon successful completion of probation where such promise did not comply with section 19-2604(2), and such promise was unenforceable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Gill
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2010-11-23· cited 59×
• State v. Schwartz
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2003-10-29· cited 50×
• State v. Branson
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1996-06-07· cited 19×
• State v. Sonnie Flores
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2017-06-20· cited 13×
• State v. Charles Earl Guess
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2013-04-25· cited 10×
• State v. Allen
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2014-05-12· cited 5×
• State Ex Rel. City of Sandpoint v. Whitt
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2008-09-04· cited 2×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. McCoy
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1971-06-25· cited 76×