State v. Fuller
Citations
- 111 La. 85
- 35 So. 395
- 1903 La. LEXIS 493
Syllabus
<p>COURTS—FIXING CASES—PUBLICATION OF NOTICE-CRIMINAL LAW—CONTINUANCE-WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY.</p> <p>1. There is no law requiring the publication in the newspapers of notice of the fixing of cases in the district courts.</p> <p>2. The matter of granting or refusing a continuance is largely within the discretion of the trial judge, and, when the continuance is refused upon a question of fact, his ruling will not be disturbed.</p> <p>3. The refusal of the trial judge to permit the attorney for the defendant to withdraw after a continuance has been refused, and the jury called, works no injury to the defendant.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
Judges: Monroe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BradleySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1851-06-15· cited 17×
- State v. NathanielSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1900-01-15· cited 10×
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1849-06-15· cited 5×
- State v. FosterSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1884-10-15· cited 5×
- State v. GuillorySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1893-01-15· cited 5×
- State v. CelestinSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1896-01-11· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.