Skip to main content

State v. Fuller

Citations

  • 660 A.2d 915
  • 1994 Me. LEXIS 314

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant was not entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his motion for a new trial because his allegations of juror misconduct, even if proved, were insufficient to show any extraneous information was conveyed to the jury
  • holding that a defendant was not entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his motion for a new trial because his allegations of juror misconduct, even 27 if proved, were insufficient to show any extraneous information was conveyed to the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wathen, Glassman, Clifford, Rudman, Dana, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.