Skip to main content
· 5/12/1896

State v. Fugitt

Citations

  • 66 Mo. App. 625
  • 1896 Mo. App. LEXIS 118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a claim that postconviction counsel suffered from a conflict of interest was not preserved for review
  • holding that trial court did not err in accepting waiver
  • holding that trial court did not err in accepting waiver
  • noting the defendant in a criminal trial bears the burden of demonstrating actual juror prejudice to warrant a change of venue
  • describing Stanko’s statement before the trial court that “he had the opportunity to confer with his PCR attorneys, but [] nothing had changed regarding his desire to retain Diggs”
  • describing Stanko’s statement before the trial court that “he had the opportunity to confer with his PCR attorneys, but [] nothing had changed regarding his desire to retain Diggs”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bond

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.