New Mexico Supreme Court· 12/8/2005

State v. Fry

Citations

126 P.3d 516
138 N.M. 699

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

observing that 11 where no error has been established, there is no basis for a claim of cumulative error
stating that a “compelling reason” is required before this Court will overrule precedent
stating that a \compelling reason\ is required before this Court will overrule precedent
\[T]he weighing of aggravating and mitigating circumstances is thus not a `fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum.'\
“We do not refer to the victim by name out of respect for 13 her dignity and privacy.”
“[W]e believe that the [Wainwright v.] Witt[, 469 U.S. 412 (1985

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Serna

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

87 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.