Skip to main content
· 12/22/1982

State v. Froning

Citations

  • 328 N.W.2d 333
  • 1982 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1643

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Where the declarant whose testimony the state wishes to introduce is present at trial, gives his sworn testimony at trial, and is subject to cross-examination by the defense as happened at the petitioner’s trial, the Confrontation Clause is satisfied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reynoldson, Uhlenhopp, McCormick, Larson, Schultz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.