State v. Frishman

Citations

• 93 Kan. 595
• 144 P. 994
• 1914 Kan. LEXIS 476

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Liquor Law — Nuisance—Injunction—Contempt—Description of -Premises. A temporary injunction described the lots as in block 44. The permanent injunction described them as in block 40, but expressly made the temporary injunction permanent. Two accusations charged the defendants with contempt by violating the permanent injunction covering the lots in block 44. Both accusations were heard the same day, when the journal entry was amended nunc pro tunc correcting the error in the description. Held, that such error constituted no defense.</p>