State v. Frisby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that improper admission of hearsay warranted new trial because it was “clearly capable of producing an unjust result” (internal quotations omitted)
• noting that expert opinion on a 14 A-4887-11T1 witness' credibility encroaches upon the province of the jury
• noting that \[t]he effect of the police testimony essentially vouching for\ the version of events contrary to defendant \cannot be overstated\
• noting that \[t]he effect of the police testimony essentially vouching for\ the version of events contrary to defendant \cannot be overstated\
• finding that the defendant’s trial was tainted by a testifying witness’s reliance on inadmissible evidence
• holding a police officer cannot testify that a defendant's statement is a lie

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).