State v. Friedman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding a noise ordinance against a facially unconstitutional vagueness challenge, by interpreting the statute as proscribing only objectively unreasonable noises
• “As numerous decisions regarding such ordinances make clear, such general language is permissible so long as courts utilize a reasonableness standard when applying it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Clarksburg Inn
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2005-03-11· cited 67×
• Town of Baldwin v. Carter
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2002-04-08· cited 49×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Connally v. General Construction Co.
  Supreme Court· 1926-01-04· cited 3,272×
• Coates v. City of Cincinnati
  Supreme Court· 1971-06-01· cited 1,269×
• State v. Cameron
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1985-06-19· cited 137×
• Palmer v. City of Euclid
  Supreme Court· 1971-05-24· cited 130×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1966-03-21· cited 55×
• City of Spokane v. Fischer
  Washington Supreme Court· 1988-05-26· cited 44×
• State v. Holland
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1975-01-15· cited 21×
• Town of Nutley v. Forney
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1971-10-14· cited 7×
• City of Edina v. Dreher
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-04-24· cited 5×
• Downs Ford, Inc. v. Dover Tp.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1989-01-12· cited 3×
• State v. Powell
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-06-12· cited 2×